| User | Post |
|
6:20 am July 27, 2009
| Greyzy
| | Germany | |
| Member | posts 19 |
|
|
Hi guys,
a few years ago there was a survey on 2+2 where readers posted their personality type according to a specific method. Out of the 16 possible types there was at least 1 (as far as I remember) that was significantly higher than in the "normal" population. I found the test very interesting. I realized a lot about myself and that helped me very much not only in poker, but also in the other areas of my life.
Here's more information on the concept: http://www.teamtechnology.co.u…..-simpl.htm
And here is the online test: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cg…..Types2.asp
The result on 2+2 was that even though just 2.1% of the population are of the type INTJ (link to the table with the population split: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M….._Indicator) there were a lot more people of that type in the group on 2+2 (at least the ones who replied to the poll ).
Needless to say that I am also INTJ… 
So in case you not only want to study the book, but also yourself give it a try. If you like then let us know your type and let's find out if poker players tend to have certain personality types?
Enjoy,
Greyzy
|
|
|
10:31 am July 28, 2009
| weasel97
| | | |
| Member | posts 3 |
|
|
let's find out if poker players tend to have certain personality types?
I'm not sure you can generalize to this extent.
Mostly, because the people that will participate here, and on 2+2 are not a representative sample of poker players.
I would think that the NT types would show up much more among the readers of poker books, and participants of poker forums.
The N's are looking for patterns and theoretical information, and the T's are processing information by thinking about it, rather than reacting emotionally. Moreover, the J types are more interested in the big picture than how they got there. And the I's are think then act, rather than act, then think.
Frankly, the "feel" players aren't going to show up reading books, or posting on forums. The "math" players are.
That's why you probably see INTJ types at a higher rate than in the general populace, or even a higher rate than their distribution among poker players.
–Just an INTJ looking for a pattern.
|
|
|
4:51 pm July 28, 2009
| mark
| | | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
|
2:42 am July 29, 2009
| Tackleberry
| | Germany | |
| Member | posts 29 |
|
|
INTJ (being on the borderline to INFJ by the way). Still I think weasel made a very (!!) good estimation of why it might be wrong to generalize the results of 2+2 for the whole "poker community" (in and outside the forums).
- Tack -
|
|
|
3:16 am July 29, 2009
| JJS
| | | |
| Member | posts 47 |
|
|
INTJ for me too… Big surprise (NOT)
|
|
|
4:26 am July 29, 2009
| Greyzy
| | Germany | |
| Member | posts 19 |
|
|
JJS said:
INTJ for me too… Big surprise (NOT)
If I had had to pick one forum member and guess his/her type then it would have been you being INTJ, LOL! 
|
|
|
3:14 pm July 29, 2009
| orestto
| | Mexico | |
| Member | posts 17 |
|
|
|
11:07 am August 7, 2009
| Poko Ono
| | | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
|
11:59 am August 20, 2009
| rgriffith
| | West Virginia | |
| New Member | posts 1 |
|
|
solid ENTP.
I missed the 2+2 thread, so I'll have to go read it. This is interesting.
|
|
|
10:09 pm September 29, 2009
| Jamleeco
| | | |
| Member | posts 11 |
|
|
I came flat out as an ENTP. Well, not flat out. said slight on E and moderate on other three, guess I'm wishy-washy?
NE way, didnt' say if this would make me suck at poker or not. I suspect the stakes you play and live vs. online could influence their profitibality attributes at said games.
Good posts. I read the synopsis on my type and both the good parts and bad parts were pretty on,,almost scary on a couple of them,
|
|
|
12:52 am October 22, 2009
| mysecondwind
| | | |
| New Member | posts 2 |
|
|
|
2:37 pm March 21, 2010
| Jolly Rancher
| | | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
Weasel has a point. But isn't the real question a personality trend among winning poker players? The players who study and are of the 'constant improvement' type?
Why do people play? I have friends who like to play live for something to do, shoot the breeze at the table and are estatic if they win a little. These are NOT INTJs and don't win over the long haul.
I believe INTJs play to win. And love to study the game.
BTW, I'm an INTJ.
|
|